Historical Context
Humphrey
was perhaps the most modern dancer of her time. Her dancing was so top notch
that she was profitable even at the height of the recession when many people
were struggling to keep their heads above water. Her success is attributable to
her pioneer actions. Many critics consider her one of the innovators of modern
dance. Her “fall and recovery” theory and the resulting technique for the
theory were the foundations for her choreography and teaching methods (Main 92). The
motivation behind this theory was the work of Fredrick Nietzsche, a German
philosopher. He posited that there was a split in the human psyche between a
person’s Dionysian side (emotional, chaotic) and their Apollonian side
(intellectual, rational). The concept focused on the importance of relaxation
and tension in the muscles to define core movement principles. Her dance
vocabulary had its basis in the idea that any dance movement patterns fall in
one of three divisions namely unison, succession, and opposition. Movement
characteristics, on the other hand, fall into rest, sustained flow, and sharp
accent. She also used music to help her interpret her own style. She was
additionally vocal about the connection between music and movement. She
emphasized the two element’s formal qualities such as dynamic, design, and
structure.
Humphrey
was perhaps the most modern dancer of her time. Her dancing was so top notch
that she was profitable even at the height of the recession when many people
were struggling to keep their heads above water. Her success is attributable to
her pioneer actions. Many critics consider her one of the innovators of modern
dance. Her “fall and recovery” theory and the resulting technique for the
theory were the foundations for her choreography and teaching methods (Main 92). The
motivation behind this theory was the work of Fredrick Nietzsche, a German
philosopher. He posited that there was a split in the human psyche between a
person’s Dionysian side (emotional, chaotic) and their Apollonian side
(intellectual, rational). The concept focused on the importance of relaxation
and tension in the muscles to define core movement principles. Her dance
vocabulary had its basis in the idea that any dance movement patterns fall in
one of three divisions namely unison, succession, and opposition. Movement
characteristics, on the other hand, fall into rest, sustained flow, and sharp
accent. She also used music to help her interpret her own style. She was
additionally vocal about the connection between music and movement. She
emphasized the two element’s formal qualities such as dynamic, design, and
structure.
Humphrey with partner Charles Weidman
In
“Variation on a Theme of Handel” and “Air for the G String,” she gave a
physical existence to the music of Brahms and Bach. Her dancing was not intent
on evoking a specific emotion or tell a story. Rather, her considerations in
dancing were purely aesthetic. Such abstract ideologies on dancing and music
are why many consider her the most modern of all modern dancers.
Fall and Recovery


I think it's really cool that she actually got her whole theory for her technique from a philosophers studies. It shows the connection between different studies and what connects everything. He found that there was a split in the human psyche and she took it to the next level by actually applying what he was saying. It can also help people start to understand what he was trying to say also in a different way. It may make sense to someone on paper but they really understand it when they can actually see it in action.
ReplyDeleteI think it is really interesting to look at where dancers get their ideology about how dancing should be from different things and how they adapt it to their dancing. I feel as if it is a glimpse into the dancer's own life and what she was interested in in her own life. Her technique has been picked up from other dancers, but I wonder if they adapt it for the same reason she did, or whether they purely liked the aesthetic of it.
ReplyDelete